The Supreme Tax Court has held that the import value of film DVDs shall include an uplift to the purchase price to reflect royalties payable by the subsequent purchasers on their proceeds from hiring or selling the films. This uplift can be estimated.
In a referral from Portugal the ECJ was asked on the VAT situation in case of the supply of a subscription gift of small value in the form of tablets or smartphones to new subscribers of consumer protection magazines. In its opinion, the ECJ saw the circumstances of the case to suggest that the provision of a subscription bonus is an ancillary service connected with a main service because the bonus was only granted to increase the number of subscribers to the magazines and thus contributed to improve the profit situation of the plaintiff.
The Düsseldorf Tax Court had to decide whether, during the years in dispute from 2012 to 2014, losses stemming from the lease of an aircraft could still be considered for tax purposes after the aircraft was sold. The key point was the question whether there was an intention to generate income on the part of the plaintiffs. Unlike the tax office, the tax court ruled in the plaintiff's favor.
A soccer player’s promotional activities as a “brand ambassador” do not, on their own, constitute a commercial activity if the fees paid are intended solely to compensate for specific achievements and successes in the field of soccer. This was decided by the Düsseldorf Tax Court.
In its judgment of 9 April 2026 – VI R 1/24, the Supreme Tax Court ruled that, under the Agreement for the Avoidance of Double Taxation concluded between the Republic of Cyprus and the Federal Republic of Germany (Cyprus DTA 2011), Germany had, as the state of residence, the right to tax the employment income of a German resident employee, who was working on board a vessel engaged in domestic maritime transport. Furthermore, it clarified that a ‘vessel engaged in inland waterway transport’ within the meaning of the Cyprus DTA 2011 is only one that operates exclusively on inland waterways situated within the mainland.
Recurring remuneration from a typical silent partnership between the employee and the employer company is taxable as capital investment income within the meaning of Section 20 (1) No.4 Income Tax Act and not separately as commercial income or income from employment.
In a recently published decision, the Supreme Tax Court clarified that foundations with legal capacity are not subject to trade tax per se. The decisive factor is whether economic business operations within the meaning of the Trade Tax Act are carried out.
According to a decision of the Supreme Tax Court, commercial property trading - which is harmful for the extended trade tax deduction - may be precluded under specific circumstances of the individual case if neither property sales nor preparatory measures are carried out within the five-year period and several property sales occur only in the sixth year.
In a decision published in April 2025 the Supreme Tax Court held that the effective day on which the actual activities are carried out by a partnership is relevant to determine the begin of its trade tax liability.
In a most current judgment, the Supreme Tax clarified the procedural and substantive handling of a late filing penalty when a VAT assessment is amended to a taxpayer's benefit (surplus) during ongoing litigation.
In a most recent decision, the European Court of Justice held that action on the part of the debtor dating back a number of years and the fact that there is, in the Member State in which the debtor is established, a law capable of hindering the enforcement of the claim concerned may be taken into account in establishing urgency for a European Account Preservation Order.
According to a decision of the Baden-Württemberg Tax Court, the change of an investment fund’s Luxembourg-based management company is not subject to real estate transfer tax. The transfer of the power of management is not regarded as a taxable transfer of shares because the legal ownership of the shares remains with the investors. The transfer of the power of management thus does not automatically result in a transfer of shares.
The Supreme Tax Court referred to the European Court of Justice the question whether, in accordance with the principle of effectiveness, EU law precludes a national practice whereby the taxpayer's good faith in fulfilling the conditions for the margin scheme is not taken into account during the tax assessment procedure but rather considered later in fully separate proceedings.
The Berlin-Brandenburg Tax Court decided that the relevant double tax agreement with the US requires US withholding tax on dividends to be credited against German trade tax even though the Trade Tax Act does not contain any provisions equivalent to the tax credit rules for corporation tax. It is interesting to note that the Hesse Tax Court had already decided likewise in a decision from February 2021.
Services provided by a fitness studio operator are also subject to VAT if the gym is closed. The continued payment of membership fees as well as the replacement services offered by the gym operator during the corona lockdown is an exchange of services subject to VAT. According to a most recent judgment of the Supreme Tax Court this also applies if the members (as the recipients of the service) do not actually make use of the offered gym services, do not wish to do so or are unable to make use of them.
Interest on trade tax refunds pursuant to Section 233a of the General Tax Code (AO) must be recorded as business income when determining taxable income. In a most recently published decision the Supreme Tax Court further stated that the treatment of interest that is not deductible (i. e. added back to income) as interest on arrears pursuant to Section 4 (5b) Income Tax Act versus interest refunds which are subject to income tax does not violate the principle of equality under the Basic Law.
In a case decided by the Supreme Tax Court, an application submitted to the Portuguese tax authorities before 1 April 2020 led to a ten-year tax exemption of the pension income for a taxpayer who had permanently moved to Portugal However, in order to prevent a double non-taxation in such cases Germany has agreed a subject-to-tax clause with Portugal if such income is not taxed in Portugal.
The Supreme Tax Court decided that voucher codes for use in the X network - regardless of the distribution channel - are so-called single-purpose vouchers and their transfer is subject to German VAT because the place of performance is in Germany, and the amount of VAT is already determined at the time of issue based on the country code of the user accounts.
Serious doubts as to whether a distribution of an estate will lead to a change in the shareholder structure of at least 90% of the shares in a property-owning limited liability company within the meaning of Section 1(2b) of the Real Estate Transfer Tax Act (RETTA)
In a most recent decision, the European Court of Justice held that that Belgium acted in breach of its obligations under the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) laying down rules against tax avoidance practices that directly affect the functioning of the internal market by failing to adopt the laws, regulations, and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Article 8 (7) of that directive.
