In a most recent judgment following a Polish request for a preliminary ruling, the General Court of the EU confirmed the incompatibility of the local input VAT regulations with EU Law and held that the right to deduct input VAT arises with the supply and the chargeability of the tax, and must not depend on the immediate possession of an invoice provided that the taxable person did receive the invoice before submitting the VAT return. Any national “forced deferral” violates the principle of fiscal neutrality.
A non-profit association that entitles its sponsor to market the sponsorship measure as part of its advertising while at the same time indicating the association's promotion on its products is a service in return for the sponsorship funds received and as such fully deductible as business expense and not treated as donations. This was decided by the Hamburg Tax Court.
Once again, the European Court of Justice was asked to define the criteria for a voucher from a VAT point of view. The request for a preliminary ruling from the Swedish Supreme Administrative Court concerns a loyalty program with points earned based on the purchase price which can be redeemed later in a “points shop” in connection with a future purchase. The court held that loyalty points of this kind do not constitute a “voucher” within the meaning of Article 30a of the VAT Directive.
In a most current judgment, the European Court of Justice - following a request for a preliminary ruling from the Republic of Lithuania - decided that transactions involving the exchange of currency for virtual money in an online game do not meet the criteria for VAT exemption under Article 135 (1) Letter e of the VAT Directive. The court further emphasized that gold does not constitute a “voucher” and that therefore the entire proceeds from the sale is subject to VAT.
In three cases and following oral proceedings on 12 November 2025, the Supreme Tax Court held that using the capitalized earnings value method for the valuation of residential property to determine the land tax from January 1, 2025, to be constitutional.
In a most recent judgment, the European Court of Justice held, that the German legislation which excludes the reduced VAT rate applicable to short-term accommodation services provided in hotels and similar establishments which are not directly used for that accommodation is not in breach of EU law. Those rules must, however, be applied to concrete and specific aspects of the categories of accommodation services referred to in point (12) of Annex III of the VAT Directive and ensure that the principle of fiscal neutrality is preserved.
In a most recently published decision, the Supreme Tax Court commented on the VAT situation regarding membership fees for non-profit sports clubs and held that they may be subject to VAT. However, it must be verified whether the sports club provides its members with a single service or several separate services, and whether this constitutes a tax-exempt transaction or one subject to VAT.
In a recently published decision, the Supreme Tax Court commented on the issue of recognizing prior ownership periods in the case of a qualified share exchange during the year with respect to the relief for dividends on qualifying holdings (trade tax intercompany dividend privilege). The court rejected a deduction of the dividend from the trade tax basis because the cut-off date “at the beginning of the period of levy” applicable under Section 9 (2a) TTA was not met since the plaintiff did not yet hold an interest in V GmbH at the beginning of the assessment period.
The failure to tax the deemed capital gain under Section 17 (1) Sentence 2 Income Tax Act at the level of the shareholder in the case of a hidden contribution of shares in a corporation is not a reduction in income as provided in Section 8 (3) Sentence 4 Corporation Tax Act which would otherwise result in an increase in taxable income. This was decided by the Supreme Tax Court in a recently published judgment.
In a most recent decision, the European Court of Justice held that that Belgium acted in breach of its obligations under the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) laying down rules against tax avoidance practices that directly affect the functioning of the internal market by failing to adopt the laws, regulations, and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Article 8 (7) of that directive.
On 13 February 2026, the Federal Ministry of Finance (MoF) sent a comprehensive draft circular on the principles applied by the tax administration regarding the concept of a permanent establishment and the establishment of a permanent establishment in domestic and international tax law to interested associations for comment by 13 March 2026. The circular aims to systematically present the factual requirements for a permanent establishment under Section 12 of the General Tax Code (GTC) that are relevant for the application of numerous income tax regulations and to clarify the relationship to the concept of a permanent establishment under treaty law in accordance with Article 5 of the OECD Model Tax Convention. The circular takes comprehensive account of the current case law of the Supreme T ...
The Federal Cabinet today adopted the Common Action Plan against Organized Crime. It was jointly developed by the Federal Ministry of Finance, the Federal Ministry of the Interior, and the Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection.
The Supreme Tax Court has commented on the requirements for an item of daily use and decided that the profit/loss from the sale of high-priced everyday items is not taxable as capital gain from "private disposals" (Section 23 (1) No. 2 Sentence 2 Income Tax Act).
In a judgment published today the Supreme Tax Court clarified that companies can cover the costs of farewell parties for departing employees without incurring tax disadvantages as long as the event is organized as a company event.
In a decision published in April 2025 the Supreme Tax Court held that the effective day on which the actual activities are carried out by a partnership is relevant to determine the begin of its trade tax liability.
In the case of the partial transfer of individual business assets pursuant to Section 6 (5) Sentence 3 No. 2 Income Tax Act, the taxable profit is not to be determined by adhering to the so-called strict separation theory but rather according to the modified separation theory with proportional allocation of the book value up to the amount of the partial consideration. This was decided by the Supreme Tax Court in a most recently published judgment.
In a recently published decision, the Supreme Tax Court has, in some aspects, facilitated the tax recognition of employee-financed pension commitments for shareholder managing directors of a limited liability company (GmbH) but at the same time it also set some limits.
When testing the arm's length nature of the interest rate on a direct pension commitment financed through deferred compensation in favor of a shareholder-employee, the interest rate agreed for the similar pension promise in favor of an employee who is not a shareholder and who is employed in the same company is not a suitable yardstick, the Supreme Tax Court said in a most recently published decision.
The Düsseldorf Tax Court has decided that a so-called bond stripping model involving a partnership limited by shares (KGaA) as a shareholder in a Luxembourg Société d’Investissement à Capital Variable (SICAV) constitutes an abuse of legal form under Section 42 of the German General Tax Code (Abgabenordnung). Does this really mark the end of the legal proceedings that have been ongoing since 2018?
In a most recent judgment, the Supreme Tax Court decided that the obligation to use the special electronic mailbox also applies if a tax advisor who exercises his right to represent himself or represents a relative files a lawsuit before a tax court as a private individual without referring to his accreditation as a tax advisor.
