In a fundamental judgment, the Supreme Tax Court decided that in cases where the taxpayer has fulfilled the notification obligation under Section 30 (1) or (2) of the German Inheritance Tax Act and the tax office requires the submission of a gift tax return the deferral of the limitation period for gift tax assessment only ends when the gift tax return is filed but no later than at the end of the third calendar year after the year in which the tax arose.
An interim decision pursuant to Section 99 (2) of the Code of Procedure of Fiscal Courts (Finanzgerichtsordnung - FGO) with regard to the extended assessment period (statute of limitations) pursuant to Section 169(2) sentence 2 alternative 1 of the German Fiscal Code for tax evasion is not permissible if there are no findings regarding the reason for and amount of the respective tax claim and thus on the objective and subjective facts of a criminal offence.
In its decision of 4 November 2009 (II B 48/19), published on 16 January 2020, the Supreme Tax Court held that Section 16(1) No. 2 Real Estate Transfer Act (“RETT Act”) did not provide for a time limit for the cancellation of purchase transactions. The special limitation period set out in Section 16 (4) RETT related to the cancellation of the agreement itself and not to the date on which an application was made to cancel the RETT assessment.
