In a judgment published today the Supreme Tax Court clarified that companies can cover the costs of farewell parties for departing employees without incurring tax disadvantages as long as the event is organized as a company event.
According to a most recent decision of the Supreme Tax Court, the income from employment of a pilot resident in Germany and who is employed in international air traffic by a Swiss-based company is only exempt from German income tax (subject to progression) to the extent that he performs his activity on Swiss soil and in Swiss airspace in accordance with the principle of territoriality.
In a most recent circular, the Federal Ministry of Finance (MoF) has commented on the input VAT deduction from services obtained by an entrepreneur prior to the switch from the standard taxation to taxation under the small business regime in Section 19 of the German Value Added Tax Act.
In its judgment published today, the European Court of Justice held that the operator of an online marketplace is responsible for the processing of personal data contained in advertisements published on its platform. The operator must identify, before publication, advertisements that contain sensitive data and verify that the advertiser is actually the person whose data appears in such an advertisement or that the advertiser has the explicit consent of that person.
In two most recently published decisions the Supreme Tax Court commented on the VAT situation in the event of the sale of a business which is not turnover within the meaning of the VAT Act under certain circumstances. The court denied VAT exemption in both cases, namely where - after the sale - the business is continued by the lessee and where facilities in a solar park are transferred to various purchasers while continuing to feed electricity into the grid.
In a most recently published decision, the Supreme Tax Court held that the first acquisition of a share in a partnership by a party who was not previously a partner under civil law is a taxable event for real estate transfer tax purposes pursuant to Section 1 (2a) of the Real Estate Transfer Tax Act (RETTA).
With the entry into force of the Act for the Modernisation of Partnership Law (“MoPeG”) on 1 January 2024, the legislators fundamentally reformed the rules regarding defective resolutions for commercial partnerships (OHG, KG, GmbH & Co. KG). Sections 109–115 of the German Commercial Code (HGB) contain for the first time detailed provisions on resolution procedures and the judicial enforcement of resolution defects.
In a most recent decision in relation to a request to suspend a tax payment, the Supreme Tax Court confirmed the constitutionality of the rate of the late- payment penalties because of the rise in interest rates that began with the start of the war in Ukraine. According to the Court, at least since March 2022, there are no longer any serious doubts about the constitutionality of the statutory regulation on the amount of late-payment surcharges.
In a recent judgment, the Supreme Tax Court decided that the statutory interest levied on late payment or refund of value added tax amounts pursuant to Section 233a of the General Tax Code does not contravene EU law.
Interest on trade tax refunds pursuant to Section 233a of the General Tax Code (AO) must be recorded as business income when determining taxable income. In a most recently published decision the Supreme Tax Court further stated that the treatment of interest that is not deductible (i. e. added back to income) as interest on arrears pursuant to Section 4 (5b) Income Tax Act versus interest refunds which are subject to income tax does not violate the principle of equality under the Basic Law.
In a most current circular, the Federal Ministry of Finance (MoF) revised its position on the application of the OECD Model Tax Convention when interpreting double taxation agreements (DTAs). This was prompted by the publication of a decision of the Supreme Tax Court of 5 December 2023.
The Italian trust mandates (of fiduciary arrangements) are subject to EU anti-money laundering transparency rules. According to a decision of the European Court of Justice, public access to beneficial ownership data remains compatible with EU fundamental rights, provided that it is strictly conditioned on proving a legitimate interest.
In the case of an atypical (non-typical) silent partnership interest in a limited partnership, the tax bases for the “partnership and atypical silent partner” and those for the limited partnership cannot be determined separately and uniformly in a single assessment notice, the Supreme Tax Court said in a most recently published decision.
In two judgments published in April 2025, the Supreme Tax Court decided that a corporation in which there is an atypical silent partnership can be a subsidiary within a corporation tax group. With its rulings, the court deviated from an earlier opinion of the tax authorities. The Federal Ministry of Finance has now commented on the consequences of the two judgments.
In a most recently published decision, the Supreme Tax Court held that the interest rate of 5.5% applicable under Section 14(1) Sentence 3 of the Valuation Act (regarding lifetime usufructs and annuities) does not violate the principle of equality of Article 3(1) Basic Law when used to value a monthly lifetime annuity of the beneficiary for gift tax purposes.
In a recently published judgment, the Supreme Tax Court decided that the disallowance to deduct special business expenses under Section 4i Sentence 1 of the German Income Tax Act for partnerships with foreign partners may also apply to cases of Dutch group taxation. Furthermore, it is not only important whether a formal deduction for business expenses is made abroad, but also whether the expenses economically reduce the taxable income abroad.
In a most recent judgment, the General Court of the EU decided that national legislation requiring a 100 percent ownership interest to qualify for a VAT group to be incompatible with EU law unless that condition is a necessary and appropriate measure to achieve the objectives of combating tax evasion or avoidance. The Court also found that taxpayers cannot directly invoke the provisions of the VAT Directive.
The right to tax carried interest (i.e. the additional share of profits disproportionate to the capital invested) is vested in the country of residence either under Art. 21(1) Double Tax Agreement-USA (“DTA-USA”) (Other Income) or under Art. 13(5) DTA-USA (Capital Gains) if the corresponding income constitutes income from asset management and not income from business activities. In a recent decision, the Schleswig-Holstein Tax Court ruled on the treaty qualification of the carried interest received by a German resident shareholder (the intervenor) of a limited liability company established under the law of the US state of Delaware with its registered office and place of management in the US (the claimant).
Foreign companies as shareholders that are eligible for a refund of withholding tax in accordance with Art. 5 of the Parent-Subsidiary Directive are entitled to interest under EU law if the refund of the tax amounts is withheld from them in violation of EU law or if - for the same reason - tax is withheld from the outset. This was decided by the Supreme Tax Court in a recent judgment.
In a recently published decision, the Supreme Tax Court had to determine whether, and under what conditions, the acquisition of a share in a partnership is subject to real estate transfer tax if the interest is held under a trust arrangement and the share is later transferred from the trustee to the trustor.
